Adventures in Etymology! Cacafuego

What story could be a more stirring one than Sir Francis Drake’s capture of a treasure-laden galleonoff the coast of Ecuador in 1579?  What could be more thrilling to imagine than the great aerial dogfights between the Luftwaffe and English Spitfires during the Battle of Britain in 1940?  And what could be heroic than a grad student drawing an etymological connection between the two events in North Carolina in 1989?

Some of world’s most exciting events have come to my attention in the most humdrum of ways.  It is, I suppose, the bookworm’s fate.  But while I have learned some amazing things from musty old books, it was a memorable day indeed when I inserted the brand-new CD-ROM of the Oxford English Dictionary into a computer by the Reference Desk at UNC’s Davis Library.  What fun it was (what deeply nerdy fun!) to peruse a venerable philological database in a state-of-the-art electronic fashion.  What a revelation it was to pore over the results of these new-fangled “word searches” as they came chugging out of the clunky dot-matrix printer.

I spent a lot of time with this disk over the next few weeks.  One day it occurred to me that I’d like to know how word focus, which means “hearth” in Latin, had come to have the abstract meaning of “center” in English.  It made sense, of course.  The hearth is the innermost part of a home.  Still, I wondered, when had the fire gone out of the fireplace?  (It was still present in the Spanish derivatives: fuego, for instance, is the standard word for “fire.”)  Surely the OED could supply the answer, as in fact it did.  “Focus” had been coined in English by no less than Thomas Hobbes.  “The focus of an hyperbole is in the axis,” he writes, in a mathematical lesson from 1656.  Good enough, I thought, ready to move on.

But then I noticed, a little further down in the list of search results, the word “Cacafuego,” the name, as it happens, of a Spanish ship.  A few years before Hobbes was born, Sir Francis Drake had surprised the Spaniards in the Pacific by seizing a treasure ship, Nuestra Señora de la Concepción, more colloquially known as the Cacafuego, “The Shit-Fire.”  Although her title would suggest a warship of some ferocity, the Cacafuego was unarmed and surrendered to Drake without a fight.  Sir Francis was richly rewarded for his labor, making off with chest upon chest of silver and gold, “about £12 million today,” according to Wikipedia.  But despite the enormous haul, it was the galleon’s florid name that seemed to stick in English minds.

Now, the Elizabethans were a frank people, but still given to a sort of winking euphemism. We can thank them for words like “Gosh” for “God,” “Zounds” for “By His Wounds,” and yes, “spitfire” for the more accurate “shitfire.”  Still, from the seventeenth century onward, quotations for both “cacafuego” and “spitfire” are to be found in English.  A pugnacious connotation still clung to the spitfire even into the twentieth century, and it was eventually applied to the name of a fighter-plane designed by engineer, R.J. Mitchell, which was the hero of the Battle of Britain.

There’s a movie from 1942, in fact, all about the triumphant rise of this fighter.  Called “First of the Few” in England and “Spitfire” in America, the film was directed by the Leslie Howard, who also played Mitchell.  At one point, Mitchell/Howard thinks out loud about what to name his new aircraft. “The plane’s a curious sort of bird, a bird that breathes fire and spits out death and destructions—a spitfire bird!”  The real Mitchell had been apparently more derisive when informed by his employers about the plane’s title.  “Just the sort of bloody silly name they would choose,” he is reported to have said.  Whether he was channeling for Sir Francis Drake I will not speculate.

Advertisements

About Uncomely and Broken

I teach Latin and Greek at The University of the South in Sewanee, Tennessee.
This entry was posted in Classics, England, Language & Etymology, Nautical. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Adventures in Etymology! Cacafuego

  1. Greg Bird says:

    The actress Lupe Velez was known as the “Mexican Spitfire”, and there were eight films made with her in the character of the Mexican spitfire. Some older readers of the column may remember Johnny Weissmuller.as Tarzan; he also played “Jungle Jim”, which occasionally featured in my after-school television viewing in the 1960s, and had won Olympic medals in swimming and water polo (polo played in water can be quite difficult).
    If anybody is interested in reading about the importance of the hearth in the foundation myths of various Italian cities, especially Rome, a good start is The Myths of Rome by T. P. Wiseman (University of Exeter Press; Exeter, Devon; 2008; ISBN 9780859897044) and Roman myth and mythography by J. N. Bremmer and N. M. Horsfall ( University of London, Institute of Classical Studies; London; 1987; ISBN 090587539). In recent years there has been a lot of reassessment in the field of Roman mythology, particularly regarding Romulus and Remus. The Lares (“spirits” of the hearth and household) and Servius Tullius (supposedly born from a phallus emerging from the ashes of the hearth), and Caeculius, the founder of Praeneste and son of Vulcan, have gained a measure of centrality in understanding Roman, and related, mythologies. Rome was built on its cloacae, literally, and its empire on military and engineering skills. The Palatine Hill, before, the settlement by Romulus and his gang, was the haunt of Cacus (another fire-associated minor deity, living underground). Caca, his sister, was, not surprisingly, a goddess of the drains.
    The exploration of the mythology, and the etymology, associated with Caca (and carcer, and the “blind little boy”, Caeculius) and Sterculius (the god of fertilising/faeces) may be a s**t job, but it seems to hold a lot of unpolished nuggets.
    I wish you, uncomelyandbroken, as a graduate student, all the best with your faeces/thesis (thesis is an anagram of e-shits).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s